<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quotable Country &#8211; 03/15/09 Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/</link>
	<description>Country music. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollerin Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollerin Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that neutrality is a very important part of criticism.  My audience is the listener, and if I feel an artist has released something that is insulting towards the listener, it makes me angry, and its precisely my role in the process to breathe fire at the guy (for all the good it does).  

But I&#039;m not a &quot;reporter&quot;, I&#039;m a critic.  When I &quot;review&quot; a concert my job isn&#039;t to simply decribe costume changes or detail set lists - heck the artists&#039; management could submit that info themselves - my job is to judge what I saw.  Was it good? Was it bad? In what way?  That&#039;s the whole reason I&#039;m there.

I say shame on Shelburne for holding back when he sees bad things, his loyalty should be to his readers, not to the industry, and if he sees an awful concert, he should let his readers know.

also, though the artists may be pissed off or whatever, whenever I give a bad review I think of it as doing the artist a favor, there aren&#039;t that many people who are going to work hard to give an honest uncompromising critical assessment of your work, they should appreciate it when they get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that neutrality is a very important part of criticism.  My audience is the listener, and if I feel an artist has released something that is insulting towards the listener, it makes me angry, and its precisely my role in the process to breathe fire at the guy (for all the good it does).  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not a &#8220;reporter&#8221;, I&#8217;m a critic.  When I &#8220;review&#8221; a concert my job isn&#8217;t to simply decribe costume changes or detail set lists &#8211; heck the artists&#8217; management could submit that info themselves &#8211; my job is to judge what I saw.  Was it good? Was it bad? In what way?  That&#8217;s the whole reason I&#8217;m there.</p>
<p>I say shame on Shelburne for holding back when he sees bad things, his loyalty should be to his readers, not to the industry, and if he sees an awful concert, he should let his readers know.</p>
<p>also, though the artists may be pissed off or whatever, whenever I give a bad review I think of it as doing the artist a favor, there aren&#8217;t that many people who are going to work hard to give an honest uncompromising critical assessment of your work, they should appreciate it when they get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.M. Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>C.M. Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>Well, I think you&#039;re right that it&#039;s about a balance, but I don&#039;t see why anyone would want to write (or read) a neutral review of something terrible. Fair or level-headed, sure, but not neutral. The trick is to be honest and critical (when necessary) without also seeming like a huge jerk.

Obviously, I&#039;m still working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think you&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s about a balance, but I don&#8217;t see why anyone would want to write (or read) a neutral review of something terrible. Fair or level-headed, sure, but not neutral. The trick is to be honest and critical (when necessary) without also seeming like a huge jerk.</p>
<p>Obviously, I&#8217;m still working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>Ha.  I missed Chris&#039;s comment - I&#039;m way behind on my blog reading.  Good stuff.

But I kind of agree with Shelburne&#039;s idea - I prefer to just state the facts too as to take cheap shots at artists.  And it&#039;s actually harder to write a neutral review of something terrible than to just be venomous.  There&#039;s got to be a middle ground somewhere between taking shots and writing like Alison Bonaguro though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha.  I missed Chris&#8217;s comment &#8211; I&#8217;m way behind on my blog reading.  Good stuff.</p>
<p>But I kind of agree with Shelburne&#8217;s idea &#8211; I prefer to just state the facts too as to take cheap shots at artists.  And it&#8217;s actually harder to write a neutral review of something terrible than to just be venomous.  There&#8217;s got to be a middle ground somewhere between taking shots and writing like Alison Bonaguro though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.M. Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>C.M. Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>Thanks, David. Wasn&#039;t sure if you were still around. I&#039;m pretty bad about getting editorials done, but there should be one or two of those and some Sanity Series coming up pretty soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, David. Wasn&#8217;t sure if you were still around. I&#8217;m pretty bad about getting editorials done, but there should be one or two of those and some Sanity Series coming up pretty soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>Great (as always!), keep it coming on with my favourite feature! (Along with Sanity Series and Editorials - you should do more of them, love reading &#039;em!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great (as always!), keep it coming on with my favourite feature! (Along with Sanity Series and Editorials &#8211; you should do more of them, love reading &#8216;em!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.M. Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>C.M. Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>It just proves your point. Gary LeVox singing country is even less probable than a duck playing the harp, as the latter has actually happened. Even if Daffy&#039;s harp does only have one string.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just proves your point. Gary LeVox singing country is even less probable than a duck playing the harp, as the latter has actually happened. Even if Daffy&#8217;s harp does only have one string.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris D.</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>I was wondering when someone would see my comment on the CMT blog. I guess I picked the wrong analogy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering when someone would see my comment on the CMT blog. I guess I picked the wrong analogy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollerin Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollerin Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;but will concede that his most recent album is among his weakest (possibly at the very bottom)&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

ahh, that might explain it, that&#039;s the record that I&#039;m by far the most familiar with.  I&#039;ll have to go through more of his back catalogue I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;but will concede that his most recent album is among his weakest (possibly at the very bottom)&#8221;</em></p>
<p>ahh, that might explain it, that&#8217;s the record that I&#8217;m by far the most familiar with.  I&#8217;ll have to go through more of his back catalogue I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.M. Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>C.M. Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;man, DAC sure thinks a lot of himself, also he has an x-rated album which is out of print featuring songs that have nothing to do with his current show, and he’s probably a racist, which he denies, he’s probably scared for his life I’d say, whatever though, go see him if you want&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;man, my drug use was so significant because it was dissatisfaction that drove me to drugs, but then I found out that being a druggie can result in even more dissatisfaction, drugs are bad&lt;/i&gt;

You have a real gift for summaries.

I disagree with you on Chris Knight, though. I think the songwriting is usually there in his case, but will concede that his most recent album is among his weakest (possibly at the very bottom). Songs like &quot;If I Were You,&quot; &quot;North Dakota,&quot; and &quot;Enough Rope&quot; are killer, though, and could hold their own next to material by some of those legends you name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>man, DAC sure thinks a lot of himself, also he has an x-rated album which is out of print featuring songs that have nothing to do with his current show, and he’s probably a racist, which he denies, he’s probably scared for his life I’d say, whatever though, go see him if you want</i></p>
<p><i>man, my drug use was so significant because it was dissatisfaction that drove me to drugs, but then I found out that being a druggie can result in even more dissatisfaction, drugs are bad</i></p>
<p>You have a real gift for summaries.</p>
<p>I disagree with you on Chris Knight, though. I think the songwriting is usually there in his case, but will concede that his most recent album is among his weakest (possibly at the very bottom). Songs like &#8220;If I Were You,&#8221; &#8220;North Dakota,&#8221; and &#8220;Enough Rope&#8221; are killer, though, and could hold their own next to material by some of those legends you name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollerin Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.countrycalifornia.com/quotable-country-031509-edition/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollerin Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countrycalifornia.com/?p=1748#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>that DAC article was weak sauce.   It&#039;s like &quot;man, DAC sure thinks a lot of himself, also he has an x-rated album which is out of print featuring songs that have nothing to do with his current show, and he&#039;s  probably a racist, which he denies, he&#039;s probably scared for his life I&#039;d say, whatever though, go see him if you want.&quot; 

Also, I know I&#039;m the only one, but I&#039;m so annoyed by Jamey Johnson.  The guy put out a song about how drugs are bad - not exactly a groundbreaking topic or one that takes great courage to tackle. Even for a &quot;drugs are bad&quot; song it&#039;s weak. He groups pot in with cocaine and presumably speed, and he fails to address the existential angst that allegedly drove him to drug use in the first place.  &quot;man, my drug use was so significant because it was dissatisfaction that drove me to drugs, but then I found out that being a druggie can result in even more dissatisfaction, drugs are bad&quot;.  Thanks Jamey Johnson, you&#039;re a prophet.

That&#039;s kind of how I feel about a lot of Chris Knight songs too, they aren&#039;t really smart at all. Like Johnson&#039;s stuff, it&#039;s all sort of dressed up as hard-edged &quot;truth-telling&quot;, but when compared to the music of guys who came before - Kristofferson, Steve Earle, Billy Joe Shaver, Townes, Guy Clark, etc - it all strikes me as really not very thoughtful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that DAC article was weak sauce.   It&#8217;s like &#8220;man, DAC sure thinks a lot of himself, also he has an x-rated album which is out of print featuring songs that have nothing to do with his current show, and he&#8217;s  probably a racist, which he denies, he&#8217;s probably scared for his life I&#8217;d say, whatever though, go see him if you want.&#8221; </p>
<p>Also, I know I&#8217;m the only one, but I&#8217;m so annoyed by Jamey Johnson.  The guy put out a song about how drugs are bad &#8211; not exactly a groundbreaking topic or one that takes great courage to tackle. Even for a &#8220;drugs are bad&#8221; song it&#8217;s weak. He groups pot in with cocaine and presumably speed, and he fails to address the existential angst that allegedly drove him to drug use in the first place.  &#8220;man, my drug use was so significant because it was dissatisfaction that drove me to drugs, but then I found out that being a druggie can result in even more dissatisfaction, drugs are bad&#8221;.  Thanks Jamey Johnson, you&#8217;re a prophet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of how I feel about a lot of Chris Knight songs too, they aren&#8217;t really smart at all. Like Johnson&#8217;s stuff, it&#8217;s all sort of dressed up as hard-edged &#8220;truth-telling&#8221;, but when compared to the music of guys who came before &#8211; Kristofferson, Steve Earle, Billy Joe Shaver, Townes, Guy Clark, etc &#8211; it all strikes me as really not very thoughtful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

